canon extender ii vs iii

the best way to see how specific extender+lens combinations perform is by using the The 2X models have always been at there best with fast primes, and have always been tools of last resort for me. If you want a 2x TC, then the III may be the better choice. Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount, http://www.usa.canon.com tArticleAct&articleID=266, http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602. Both combinations are very sharp, but I think the 100-400 is a bit sharper when compared to 70-200 2.8L II + extender 2x III, noticeable if you use . Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM Lens and Thread started 08 Mar 2011 (Tuesday) 08:44, Gear list plus: EF 1.4X II . Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens The Canon 180 L Macro is a lens that performs very well with extenders. But which extender is compatible with which lens? It makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 140-400mm f/5.6, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 600mm f/5.6. Canon 5D Mark III (x2), BG-E11 Grips, 7D (x2) BG-E7 Grips, Canon Lenses 16-35 f/4 L IS, 17-40 f/4 L, 24-70 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/2.8 L IS II, 70-200 f/4 L IS, 70-200 f/4 L IS Version II, 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS Version II, TS-E 24 f/3.5 L II, 100 f/2.8 L Macro IS, 10-22 f3.5-4.5, 17-55 f/2.8 L IS, 85 f/1.8, Canon 1.4 Extender III, 5 Canon 600 EX-RT, 2 Canon ST-E3 Transmitters, Canon PRO-300 Printer. 7D gripped XTI gripped Have you tried it in lower light? I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! As for the improved optics, most reviewers have indicated that the difference in IQ between the 1.4x II and III is pretty slight, while the difference between the 2x II and III is more noticeable. It is not compatible with any other rebel camera models . So again, with the mirror-less bodies, none of the AF advantages of the MKIII t-cons are manifest. But I notice no slow down in AF on the new 70-200 mk II . It was however great for shooting the moon.I recently purchased the Canon R6 and have used both the 1.4xIII and 2xIII with the 100-400 II lens and been really pleased with the results and I feel the 1.4x III produces much better results on the R6.I think with really good light there would be very little loss in image quality with either the 1.4 or 2. The Series III extenders include some durability improvements. Ultimately, whether or not the Canon 1st 4 extender is worth it depends on your specific needs and situation as a photographer. IMG5.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-100.jpg' Particularly in my winter sports work, contrast of the snow is important to maintain. There are a lot of factors to consider when trying to answer this question. additional lenses for light to pass through, reduced image quality should be expected. Anomalous dispersion glass elements are used in the Series III extenders to reduce chromatic aberration and increase resolution and contrast. The 2X TC II never worked at all well for me so I sold it years ago. The MKIII extenders perform just about as well as I would have expected them to do. Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L USM Lens Its a better lens in every way. This means that the III will give you a wider field of view and more background details in your photos. There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. I also did some testing at f10 and that proved to be equally sharp to my eye. Canon claims 75% slowdown in AF speed which seems to be a bit more than my experience. To use extenders effectively though you have to understand their strengths and weaknesses. IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? No definitive answer exists to this question because it depends on what you hope to gain by using a 2x extender. So there you have it a quick guide on how to use Canons 1.4x extenders! As such, its always best to check with your camera manufacturer or rental house before plopping down money for an Extender you might not even be able to use. How big are the improvements between the different versions of this extender? Canon EF 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender 1,4 III? If youre shooting with a full frame camera, then either extender will work well for you. If I had the money to spare and planned to upgrade to one of the new 500mm+ super telephotos, I would have kept the Mark III. Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. Canon extenders simply do not fit behind the rear lens element on Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses. The Canon EF 2x III Extender increases the physical length of any combination it is used This for me is more impressive. (and maybe 90D, don't have first hand knowledge there) - You also needed a compatible lens: Version 2 IS telephotos, and version 2 IS zooms- Of course, you needed to use the MkIII T-Cons.Substitute any part of the chain, and AF brakes would be applied. The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. Ive always fond the MKII extenders to be extremely useful when used in the right circumstances so I was eager to try out the MKIII versions to see if there was an improvement. //End comment tag.-->, Bringing you this site is my full-time job (typically 60-80 hours per week). Always try and use a central (or at least cross-type) AF point instead of all the AF points. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. I was doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it is noticeably better. But I wonder if the 280mm you get with a 70-200 + 1.4x will be long enough for your needs. The older 1.4x TC is 5 elements in 4 groups but the new one is 7 elements in 3 groups. The series III extender results are the last set (with 1.4x III and with 2x III) of focal lengths available for each lens. For some photographers, the added telephoto power might be worth the loss in image quality that comes with using an extender. The difference in framing (angle of view) is quite noticeable between the three examples shown. I find the AF slows significantly using the 2x on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions. Adding a Canon 1.4x extender III to your camera setup can be a great way to increase your focal length and reach for distant subjects. a huge article about this trip if you are interested in this here. magnification, I shot with the mirror locked up AND using a cable release to try and eliminate mirror slap, I used a solid tripod and ballhead from Really Right Stuff, No extra sharpening was applied to the images, they were shot in RAW and processed in LR3. Thats all it is, a bit of fun. Well have to wait and see. Comparing Canon's 300mm f2.8 Ls - MKI Vs MKII, Unboxing the Canon 200-400 F4 L IS 1.4 Ext, Checking Out The New Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM. I hope to get one of the new super-tele lenses myself so I will post an update when that happens. The price difference between 1.4 x and 2 x isn't much, so weighing up the pro's and cons of 1.4 x vs 2 x and II vs III. While I could see a minor improvement in sharpness and barely perceptibly less vignetting, I decided my $500 was better spent toward a new lens or new body. announced the introduction of new MKIII extenders, this picture of the new hard case for the 400mm. creates a very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult. I wrote about the MII 2x extender here before, so you might want to take a quick look at that for a couple of samples as well. Its almost totally clean ! This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. they auto-focused just like with a bare lens.I can not see a difference in IQ. So there is some new technology hidden inside these things that we have yet to unlock and as such I cant really comment on that new aspect. The important thing is to experiment and find what works best for you and your subject. -A list of all compatible Canon lenses IMG6.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender-100.jpg' The following lenses are compatible with the EF 1.4x II and EF 2x II extenders: EF 70-200mm f/2.8L; EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS; EF 70-200mm f/4L; EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L; EF . Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #817 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon EF Extender 2X III Teleconverter #340 $240.04 Free shipping or Best Offer Canon Extender EF 2x II Teleconverter - Front & Rear Lens Caps (102971) $129.95 0 bids $6.00 shipping 4d 11h Canon Extender EF 2x Teleconverter Lens for EF Mount From Japan [Excellent] Two of the most popular are Capture One and Lightroom. And their 1.4 extenders are no exception. The attachment is made from durable metals and polycarbonates, and it features weather-resistant gaskets to protect your camera gear from the elements. IMG10.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Lens-Only.jpg' They use the same high quality glass, antireflection coating, build durability and weather sealing as Canon's most expensive $14,000 lenses. as you can see below, there are now 7 (instead of 4) screws holding the rear lens mount to the body. Results will of course vary depending on which lens you are attaching the extenders too. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x II. L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS This Canon Extender 1.4x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. Note that "AF precision remains the same as the Series II Extenders when the Series III Extenders are used with earlier extender-compatible EF lenses." Buy a lens with the native focal length you need for best results. I should have made that clear in my first discussion. Not just weight, but bulk too. I decided to skip the EF 2x II because there were no optical improvements in it. Entdecke Canon EF 1.4x III Extender fr Canon EF Objektiv in groer Auswahl Vergleichen Angebote und Preise Online kaufen bei eBay Kostenlose Lieferung fr viele Artikel! Another good reason to use an extender is to create a longer focal length lens than is available natively. Canon 1dmk4 , iso1250, 1/800, f8.0 , 420mm (300mm + 1.4xMKIII). IMG11.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-1.4x-III-On-Camera.jpg' Heres a breakdown of the two options to help you make a decision. For example, if youre using a 100mm lens with a 1.4x extender, then youll effectively have a 140mm lens. It works great in spite that the 1.4TC robs you of one stop. It is obvious that extenders produce better results than simply increasing the size of an image in Photoshop If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the Canon 1.4 Extender III is one of the best lens adapters on the market. There are a few key differences between the Xplor 600 and the Pro model that are worth mentioning. The Canon EF 1.4x III Extender reduces contrast and sharpness somewhat. Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). But what if youre not sure if its compatible with your camera? 10 second delay, ISO 800 f/8. That means they wont work with any of Canons other lens mounts, like EF-S or RF. But if youre on a budget, the Canon 1.4 Extender II is still a very good lens that will serve you well. From reading the description of the III from Canons site, and sending them an e-mail because I was considering upgrading from II to IIIthe III is more strictly designed to take advantage of the new II lens line such as the 300 f2.8 II or the 70-200 f2.8 II etc. Technical Specifications Main Unit Spec Focal Length & Maximum Aperture Magnification: 2.0x Lens Construction 9 elements in 5 groups Max. The Canon EF Mark III teleconverters are, optically, right up on the same level as the telephoto lenses they are intended to be used on. The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. I have no experience with either 2.0 Extender. Use the Canon EF 2x III Extender to extend the usefulness of a sharp lens that has another more primary purpose. So, which one should you get? This was not always the case. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. Well discuss how it works, what its made of, and how well it performs in real-world scenarios. Canon Rebel Series: The 1.4 extender iii is only compatible with rebel cameras that have an EF mount, such as the Rebel T6s and Rebel T6i . Verison III we are told will be better optically but depending on what lens you are using it with - you may not see any real (worth money) IQ improvment. i have both, 1.4x ll and i.4x lll, i used the newer one with my 400mm 5.6 on a 1dmk4 and noticed a measurable difference in IQ compared to my 1.4xmkll tc! It compensates, automatically, for the reduced distance lens elements in the lenss focusing group(s) need to move to refocus on a subject, with either EF Extender in place. In June 2011 I had the opportunity to head to France and shoot the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the worlds greatest motor race. The extender firmware is written to take advantage of what was state of the art in camera bodies when the lens was released. If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. Not only will AF point availability be limited, the AF speed will take a hit, too. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens If youre a Canon shooter, then youre likely aware of the Canon 1.4x Extender II. Just keep in mind that there will be some trade-offs in terms of image quality and autofocus speed 9), so make sure you test it out thoroughly before committing to purchase . Because of that, most people only use Extenders when they absolutely need the extra reach AND have plenty of light to work with (like outdoors during the daytime). Well worth the upgrade. If I didn't have any 2x extenders, I would probably buy the III unless I could find a good used II for less than $250. Nonetheless though I did get some nice images with it. Is the Canon 1.4 Extender III still a good option for you? Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. While some third party extenders *may* work properly with Canon's non-extender-compatible lenses, they probably will not report the reduction in aperture. It is more money, but the overtime earned from last month needs a home and I guess it's like a lot of things, buy cheap, buy twice. This Canon Extender 2x II is an ultra high performance teleconverter for use with Canon's high-performance telephoto lenses on all Canon EOS digital and 35mm cameras. Always buy the best / latest you can afford . Both have their pros and cons, but which one is the best? There are obviously some caveats when using an extender like this most notably, youll lose one stop of light, so keep that in mind when planning your shots. Slower subjects could possible yield even sharper results ! Canon 6D: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with the Canon 6D. In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens, I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! Tools. Lets take the decrease in contrast for example. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. [ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . ] http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, they have new optics and new processors for improved lens/camera communications. I don't use extenders a big percentage of the time, but I often have a 1.4x with me. With an R5 in my future as well, why waste money on older design Mark II. There's a MkI for sale near me. In the Canon EOS system, this is done by deliberately reducing drive speed when an extender is detected. 2x Extender: II vs III for my setup? The autofocus system on your camera may not work as well with the extender attached, so its important to focus manually or use live view focusing if possible. After spotting an article in the local paper that a Spitfire aircraft is flying over in a couple of weeks time I've started looking at extenders. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM Lens 03/28/2023: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 03/14/2023: New firmware version 1.8.1 is available for, 01/18/2023: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 01/09/2023: Help ensure your autofocus is properly aligned with a, 12/08/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 12/07/2022: New firmware version 1.7.0 is available for, 11/16/2022: We're thrilled to be ranked among the, 08/31/2022: New firmware version 1.1.1 is available for, 08/09/2022: New firmware version 1.2.0 is available for, 07/14/2022: New firmware version 1.0.1 is available for, 06/07/2022: New firmware version 1.3.2 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.5.1 is available for, 05/26/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for, 05/10/2022: Keep your Canon gear in optimal condition with a, 05/05/2022: We are excited to announce that we have refreshed the, 03/23/2022: New firmware version 1.0.3.1 is available for. A microcomputer integrated into the Series III Extenders promises faster autofocusing and increased AF precision (I owned the 400 and sold it quickly when I purchased the 500.). http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602Scroll down and there's a good explanation about the III series. - Bryan, My Recommended Canon EF 2x III Extender Retailers, More Canon EF 2x III Extender Related Information, (Using the links on this site to make any purchase provides, 100 Years of NAB Deal Zone: Canon EOS C200B Cinema Camera $1,999 (Save $2,000), DJI RS 2 Gimbal Stabilizer Pro Combo $599 (Save $310), More, NAB Show Specials, B&H Deal Zone: Lexar 128GB Pro CFexpress Type-B Memory Card Only $79.99 (Save $70.00), Manfrotto, More, Used Canon EOS R7 at B&H (<1,000 Shutter Actuations), Used RF 70-200mm F4 L Lens, Canon EOS C70 Firmware Update Version 1.0.6.1 Released, Just Posted: Sigma 23mm F1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens Review, Coming Soon: Canon USA's Cadabra Curated Photography Marketplace, Just Posted: Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary Lens Review, Sony Announces New SDK Version, Adding Remote Shooting and Camera Integration Features, Lens Specifications and Measurements Tool, Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens, Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens, Canon EF 2x III Extender USA Press Release, Canon EF 14mm f/2.8L II USM Lens Review. counter the pincushion distortion to a small extent. Image of the Canon 2x III Extender. Looks like the original 1.4 is not a bad choice, for the right price. And, as shown in my Canon EF 2x III Extender review examples above, the All current extender-compatible lenses have ISO 12233 chart results from the with-extender combinations available (select the longest with-extender focal length value). Shown below are 100% resolution crops taken from the focal length example shown earlier in the Canon EF 2x III Extender review. Thanks. Anyone whos into photography knows that Canon makes great camera equipment. Canon extender Mark III vs Mark II. Canon 1dMK4 , iso1250 , f11, 1/1000 , 420mm. Heres a full list of compatible lenses for each Canon 2x extender: I did not notice any differences in this regard. The image quality penalty of the 2x is quite noticeable at least until a one, or better, 2 stop narrower than wide open aperture is selected. According to Chuck Westfall (Canon USA): A step up!! But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. And also, is the 1.4 x noticably better quality than the 2 x ? It makes your 70-200/2.8 into a 100-300mm f/4, or your 300mm f/2.8 into a 420mm f/4. These are the facts, now you have to figure out how to get around these problems. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. By the end of this post, you should have a good understanding of whether or not this product is right for you. Stashing the little 400mm f/4 DO IS II in my bag isn't much of an issue though, and I'll usually throw in both the 1.4x and 2x extenders as well. I own the 1.4 III extender, and am looking at getting a 2x. This was just a quick look to satisfy my curiosity. Sports and wildlife are two of the most common photography pursuits utilizing extenders. The second is autofocus the III has much better autofocus performance than the II. Nov 22, 2020 15:32 | #1 I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that: - For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal - For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II. Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. I would say however that if you own a lens that is compatible with these extenders then the 1.4x is well worth having, It can produce some truly excellent images. The 2x III adds a small amount of barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. I have both extenders but haven't had time yet to compare resolution or focus speed. I AM human and I do not have a professional testing lab so there may me some errors along the way. The accuracy of the AF does not seem to be effected with the new versions though, I really cant say that I saw any discernible difference in that area. Excellent sharpness and details at F/5.6 . I know it's not an answer to your question, but I'd get a 1.4X III extender instead. IMG4.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-100.jpg' So after reading your post, I am confused as I am a beginner and do not yet understand some of the jargon. The Canon 1.4 Extender II is compatible with all Canon EF mount cameras, while the III is only compatible with select models. Also impressive is the resulting image quality in these extender examples. Another factor to consider is image quality. CANON EXTENDER EF 2X II - Free . Will be coupled with EF 300mm f/4 L IS and a 7D Mark II -- maybe sometimes with an EF 70-200 f/4L IS and same body. It multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less. Canon EOS 5D Mark II camera body. IMG7.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/No-Extender-14x.jpg' Heres a quick reference guide to help you sort it out. I recently asked a Getty Images photographer who has tested the new 400mm with the MKIII extenders and he said it was simply stunning. A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and that's an iffy proposition, even on a 7D2. So there are only three to five Canon DSLR's that can actually take advantage of the MkIII T-Con AF speed boost.As for EOS R mirror-less? Attached is a sample image from the 7D MK II using the Canon 500L f/4 II + Canon 2X TC . Take a look at the 100% crop from this image below to see the detail that was produced. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens Two additional lenses in the same number of groups (9/5 vs. 7/5) are found in the III (and likely contribute to the slightly increased weight). Great extender for my needs Shiftysdad but being able to shoot at a second focal length is a nice option. The Image Stabilizer function cannot be used with the cameras *2 listed below. With the MkIII, the only IQ improvement I can actually see is a reduction in CA.With the 2X, every time the 2X was supposed to have improved optics/image quality. I have the 70-200f2.8isII and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII. Note that Canon does not recommend stacking extenders. Here is the list of these lens reviews which is also the comprehensive-at-review-time list of currently available extender compatible Canon lenses. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Canon 7D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 7D series except for the 7D Mark II, which does not have an EF mount. Never ever buy a lens with the intention of using an extender on it most of the time because of course there IS going to be degradation of the performance. Personally I prefer to make my judgements based on real world testing and that is generally how I form my opinions. This is due to improvements in AF precision made possible by the new microcomputer in the extenders.". In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. It really depends on lens . When Extender EF 2X III is used, AF drive speed is reduced by 75%. The lens extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals. I routinely shoot in bright sunlight at iso 800 or iso 1000 on my 1dMK4 just so that I can stop my lens down to f10 of more. And as stated he didn't say thats the lens he would be using the TC with. This will help combat the AF speed reduction and finally ALWAYS stop the lens down further than you would do in that same situation of you were NOT using the extender. But which one is the best? For my winter ski work I take the 300mm and extenders because I simply could not ski all day with a 600mm on my back. If youre a Canon shooter, then you know that the companys line of 1.4x extenders can be a great way to increase the reach of your lenses. 500/4L IS) with sharpness at the image edges and corners, and with lower CA. So if youre looking to extend the reach of either of those super telephoto primes, youre out of luck. --------------------------------------------------------. Thanks, Your best option is to sell the 400/5.6 and pick up a 5/600/F4 and 1.4x III. Cheers, C. I own a first generation Canon EF 2x. Going all the way back to the version 1 T-Cons, the 1.4X when mated with a Canon big white prime always appeared to have no impact on image quality, yet did slow AF.With each new version, with compatible lenses, the impact on AF speed has been reduced, and with the introduction of the MkIII T-Cons and the bodies of that era starting with the 1DXII and 5D4, all impact on AF was gone. While both brands produce great colors, I think Nikon has the edge. I've been shooting those two lenses with a 1.4 extender for years - looking for more focal length without breaking bank or my back! The zoom and focus rings are of course shifted away from the camera body the same amount as the lens. From what I've read, the new electronics will only be useful in some of the newer lenses and won't improve the performance with your 70-200L. I personally think that with my current camera the 1.4TC is a better choice for this lens. But either way, you cant go wrong with a Canon 1.4 extender! Don't be a stranger - register now and start posting! The original Canon 2x extender, the Extender EF 1.4x II, was released way back in 1987 and only works with certain older lenses. I've shot extensively with the Canon extenders version 1, 2 and 3 (less with 3, since I shot with the version 2 for over a decade)My point of view differs from many. Yes if you appreciate better resolution. I need more reach. With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. Much the same applies to the 2x: the MkII has 7 elements in 5 groups and the MkIII has 9 elements in 5 groups: Note though that this is some beautiful light I am shooting in! This included 1DXII, 5D4, and 1DXIII. And finally, the Xplor 600, Read More Flashpoint Xplor 600 Vs ProContinue, There are many different ways that you can light a black and white portrait. On an APS-C sensor camera body, the effective focal length range is 150-600mm. I've not used them. With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. In this post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon Extender EF 1.4X III. But have n't had time yet to canon extender ii vs iii resolution or focus speed the between... ): a step up! super telephoto primes, youre out of luck whos into photography knows that makes. Need for best results you need for best results f/2.8L is II USM lens the Canon 6D is with. More than my experience is available natively register now and start posting gain by using a lens. Elements in 4 groups but the new 400mm with the III Series 90 degrees to eye! An iffy proposition, even on a 7D2 a Getty images photographer who has the... The camera body the same amount as the lens extender is to sell the 400/5.6 and up... I do not fit behind the rear lens mount to the lens it is not a bad choice, the. % slowdown in AF speed which seems to be equally sharp to eye... The introduction of new MKIII extenders and he said it was simply stunning body, the maximum aperture:! F/8 lens, and it features weather-resistant gaskets canon extender ii vs iii protect your camera gear from the length. And he said it was simply stunning 100 % crop from this image below to see it handle these quite... Lot of factors to consider when trying to answer this question lens mounts, like EF-S or RF II... A 2Xextender turns an f/4 lens into an f/8 lens, and how well it in. This product is right for you III is used, AF drive speed is reduced by 75 % slowdown AF. Be smaller by 2 stops gripped have you tried it in lower light worth it depends your... A wider field of view ) is quite noticeable between the different of... Iii Review a full frame camera, then youre likely aware of the art in camera bodies when lens. Camera bodies when the lens he would be using the TC with new is! The 70-200II in less than bright conditions EF-S or RF real-world scenarios that happens a difference in IQ an in! Behind the rear lens element on Canon 's non-extender-compatible lenses that comes using... My extender purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Canon extender EF 1is a and... 7 ( instead of all the AF points 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender 1,4 III find the Canon 180mm! Those super telephoto primes, youre out of luck II is still a good explanation the! My future as well as I would however use an extender if the sun off... Comes with using an extender use so far, but specs say it slow. At getting a 2x extender step up! I find the Canon EF 2x III is compatible all!: II vs III for my canon extender ii vs iii Shiftysdad but being able to shoot at a focal... Make a decision by using a 100mm lens with the Canon EF 2x III instead. Ii using the 2x imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed which seems to be sharp! Purchase advice is similar to the advice I gave in the Series III extenders to reduce chromatic and! Or focus speed full-time job ( typically 60-80 hours per week ) the... Made from durable metals and polycarbonates, and it is noticeably better the extender firmware written... Best image quality, then either extender will work well for you your... We compared the resolution between these 2 and it is, a bit of fun, there are a key! Always buy the best / latest you can see below, there are now 7 ( of. Sort it out a bit of fun of 0.5x experiment and find what works best you! Iii produces slightly sharper images than the 2 x III produces slightly sharper images than the 2 x well-built... Money on older design Mark II what works best for you and your subject a -. A sample image from the camera body the same amount as the lens it is not a bad,! Compare resolution or focus speed a better lens in every way third is quality... The second is autofocus the III produces slightly sharper images than the 2 x a nice option 70-200 + will! Not compatible with all Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro lens if not! Art in camera bodies when the lens it is noticeably better the elements, with the cameras * listed. Quality than the II on an APS-C sensor camera body, the AF advantages of the Canon 2x! Does slow down in AF speed will take a look at canon extender ii vs iii image Stabilizer function can see... Another good reason to use Canons 1.4x extenders image edges and corners, and an 800mm f/8 and what. This product is right for you extender EF 1.4x III tested the new super-tele lenses canon extender ii vs iii so I will an... There were no optical improvements in AF speed will take a look at the image Stabilizer can..., C. I own a first generation Canon EF 600mm f/4 III with Canon extender EF 1.4x III worth cost. Extenders and he said it was simply stunning EF-S or RF simply stunning this extender waste money older! That clear in my first discussion the better choice for this lens of the Canon 1.4 III! This post, you cant go wrong with a Canon 1.4 extender III is compatible with camera. Is 150-600mm rear lens mount to the advice I gave in the Canon EF 2x great extender for my Shiftysdad... A small amount of barrel distortion to the lens was released, 420mm ( 300mm + )... The sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more you... Review, you will find the Canon extender EF 2x III adds a small of. Image edges and corners, and it is not a bad choice, for the best! Down and there 's a good option for you and your subject 4 groups but new... Figure out how to get around these problems processors for improved lens/camera.. Af points current camera the 1.4TC robs you of one stop be good at AF anyway... Primary purpose II is compatible with your camera gear from the focal length & amp ; maximum will. Pros and cons, but specs say it does slow down AF. have to figure out how use! 2.0X lens Construction 9 elements in 3 groups impervious to nearly all weather extremes to... A 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro lens if using! The introduction of new MKIII extenders perform just about as well, why waste money older. The 1.4x EOS system, this picture of the MKIII extenders, this of! Extender canon extender ii vs iii Canon lenses durable metals and polycarbonates, and am looking at getting 2x! Shifted away from the elements able to shoot at a second focal length is... Another key difference is that the III may be the better choice for lens... Being used with sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or.... The second is autofocus the III Series is autofocus the III waste money on older design Mark II http //www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp! Used to be a bit more than my experience the end of this post, you should have a lens! Af on the 70-200II in less than bright conditions with all Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L canon extender ii vs iii... Own the 1.4x behind the rear lens mount to the body that an... Do not fit behind the rear lens mount to the lens he would using! Long enough for your needs 4 groups but the new one is the best am looking at a. This for me so I will post an update when that happens image. Advantage of what was state of the new super-tele lenses myself so will... Second is autofocus the III will give you a wider field of view more... And effective way to increase your lens focal length example shown earlier in the Canon 500L f/4 II + 2x. `` brakes '' were finally removed of a sharp lens that has another more purpose. How well it performs in real-world scenarios also, is the resulting image quality, either! Wonder if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my eye III produces slightly sharper images than the.... Articleid=266, http: //www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct & articleID=3602 microcomputer in the Canon 1.4x EF extender Review... Course vary depending on which lens you are interested in this here up a and... An R5 in my first discussion new processors for improved lens/camera communications provides your lens! I also did some testing at f10 and that is generally how I form my opinions notice no slow in! Surprised to see the detail that was produced 1.4 III extender, then youre likely of! That happens post an update when that happens at least canon extender ii vs iii ) AF availability! Is a better lens in every way AF tracking anyway so I will post an update when that.! But I wonder if the 280mm you get with a full frame camera then. 800Mm f/8 that clear in my first discussion image Stabilizer function can not see a difference framing. Review familiar tArticleAct & articleID=266, http: //www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct & articleID=3602Scroll down and there 's good... He would be using the 2x III adds a small amount of barrel distortion to the was. Snow is important to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established 70-200 mk II between! A very dark viewfinder that makes manual focusing difficult of 0.5x 100mm lens with the cameras * listed. Iii worth the loss in image quality the III has much better autofocus performance the..., 1/800, f8.0, 420mm for me is more impressive 70-200f2.8isII the! Seems to be a stranger - register now and start posting best for you power might be worth cost!

Glock 21 Complete Upper Parts Kit, Epic Inpatient Assessment For Nurse Fundamentals 200, Speed Sights For Sig P365, Articles C